Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Blocking p2p traffic
From: Russ Leathe <Russ.Leathe () GORDON EDU>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 20:38:52 +0000
Great product and support!! We have used Netequalizer for about 6 years. Very pleased with the results as it uses the ' fairness' principle. That is, total bw divide by # of users equals bw per user. Pretty brilliant idea. We noticed a change right away - within the first hour -with response and speed. We were a packeteer shop but quickly switch to netequalizer from day one. The students stopped complaining. :) We were literally spending about 2-3 (or more) hours per day managing the packeteer....now with the netequalizer its maybe 2-3 hours a year. The time we do spend on it is for reports and upgrades. When we need reports, it readily available. Set it and forget it! With limited staff, I recouped those hours! We manage 200MB and will be increasing to 350MB - more devices per student. The nice thing about it is we can dedicate bw to a particular app/client if needed (like streaming media or video conferencing). Great to have that flexibility. We give low bw to all p2p programs so basically it worthless to run one. Haven't had a notice in 6 years. HEOC speaks well here.
Current thread:
- Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 02)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Russ Leathe (May 02)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Coffman, Tobiah (May 03)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Santabarbara, Angelo (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic John Ladwig (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Miller,James R (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Leo Song (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic David Curry (May 07)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Santabarbara, Angelo (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Robert Lau (May 03)
- Re: Blocking p2p traffic Russ Leathe (May 02)