Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Closed Network Implementation?
From: Mike Iglesias <iglesias () UCI EDU>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:56:01 -0800
On 03/08/2013 11:27 AM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
Doing it on smaller network segments also allows you to separate research traffic from administrative traffic and it makes it easier to build a Science DMZ (http://fasterdata.es.net/science-dmz/). You can delegate administrative control of firewall contexts or virtual firewalls to departments, giving them the responsibility--and authority--to further secure their systems.
We're working on implementing a Science DMZ, which will be "outside" the firewall. There's a grant you can apply for to help defray the cost of implenting it, which we plan on doing. I believe the grant is thru NSF. -- Mike Iglesias Email: iglesias () uci edu University of California, Irvine phone: 949-824-6926 Office of Information Technology FAX: 949-824-2270
Current thread:
- Re: Closed Network Implementation?, (continued)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Barron Hulver (Mar 07)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Leo Song (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Rick Coloccia (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Harry Hoffman (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Rick Coloccia (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Harry Hoffman (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Willis Marti (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Mike Iglesias (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Michael Sinatra (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Mike Iglesias (Mar 08)
- Re: Closed Network Implementation? Michael Sinatra (Mar 08)