Re: Freedom versus Security

[Louis APONTE <LouisAponte () WEBER EDU>]

Russ
 
SANS 20 Critical Controls is an awesome template.
http://www.sans.org/critical-security-controls/
 
Push back, academic freedom and personal devices... Its to be
expected.
 
Academics are designed for forensic argumentation...we have to realize
this too is good.
 
la
 
 

> > > On 12/11/2012 at 11:02 AM, in message
<82242CE36BE27D40B4EDEB0C33ABA3941F752F13 () CH1PRD0102MB109 prod exchangelabs com>,
Russ Leathe <Russ.Leathe () GORDON EDU> wrote:


Sure,
 
Besides the most common ones, HIPPA, FERPA, etc.
 
Federal Red Flags Rule and Massachusetts 201-CMR-17.00. 
 
 
 

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of SCHALIP, MICHAEL
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 3:02 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Freedom versus Security

 Interesting.....can you share which federal (and state) guidelines you
are using to drive your policies?  We continuously struggle with things
as simple as "how long do we HAVE to keep email for?"....and I'm not
talking about "records"......just an email that might have nothing more
than the cafeteria's lunch menu..... M Russ Leathe
<Russ.Leathe () GORDON EDU> wrote: 

Silly question, but*
 
Have you had the discussion (with Staff and/or Faculty) about your
policy’s “controlling nature” regarding electronic security? Currently,
we are actively implementing our WISP (Written Information Security
Policy), according to State and Federal Guidelines.  Unfortunately, we
are getting some push back. 
 
One in particular, a personally owned laptop must adhere to the
Colleges guidelines of authentication.
 
If you have run into this scenario, how did you resolve it?
 
Thanks,
 
Russ
 
 
 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner ( http://www.mailscanner.info/ ), and
is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner ( http://www.mailscanner.info/ ), and
is 
believed to be clean.