Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: security management techniques


From: Dan Sarazen <dsarazen () BRANDEIS EDU>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:01:28 -0400

Hi A.J.,

Quick question: Are you using this same standard for your health center? I
was under the impression that NIST didn't include the HIPAA requirements,
but I'm willing to be wrong.

Thanks,
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Wright, A J (A. J.)
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:45 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: security management techniques

We're using NIST SP800, and have been pretty happy with it.

- Its got a good control catalog (800-53) with good audit instructions
(800-53a.)
- There are grants that are asking for it (or its related sibling: FISMA.)
- It has good risk management (800-37.)
- It has the right price (free.)
- It has documentation with guidance on many special topics in the area.
- Its simple enough to explain with PLENTY (wow) of documentation to back it
up.

My biggest complaint is that it (and FIPS199) doesn't offer clarification on
absolute vs. relative control levels.  Just because a service is "high
confidentiality" for my institution, does not mean we're going to apply
military-grade confidentiality controls.

If others are using NIST, I'd love to hear how its going and trade
practices.
ajw
--
A. J. Wright
Chief Information Security Officer
University of Tennessee

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of David Pirolo
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:10 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: [SECURITY] security management techniques

Just wondering if any other schools have standardized on any of these
security management techniques.
ISO 17799 / 27001, COBIT, NIST, ENISA, OASIS, OWASP, etc.

If so, I'd be interested in your feedback of such.  Unless I'm grossly
missing something, it seems like one has to pay to get the ISO standards
from ISO.org/ANSI.  That doesn't make sense...

-David


Current thread: