Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Privacy policy question
From: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks () VT EDU>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:17:36 -0400
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:50:21 -0400, "John K. Lerchey" said:
"Whenever possible and legally permissible, notification must be given to the faculty member whose data are subject to subpoena, search warrant, or order of court prior to compliance therewith, and, whenever possible and legally permissible, sufficient time must be allowed, before intrusion, to allow the faculty member to file a motion to quash. "
Faculty members get time to file a motion to quash, but staff and students don't? Are you able to share the reasoning there, or is it internal sausage-making that we don't want to know about?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Privacy policy question David R. Millar (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question John K. Lerchey (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question David R. Millar (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Valdis Kletnieks (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Shamblin, Quinn (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question David R. Millar (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Guy Almes (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Jeffrey Schiller (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Guy Almes (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question Lisa Ho (Jun 04)
- Re: Privacy policy question Shamblin, Quinn (Jun 01)
- Re: Privacy policy question John K. Lerchey (Jun 01)