Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: (***POSSIBLE SPAM***) Re: [SECURITY] Self-service password reset approaches


From: Gary Flynn <flynngn () JMU EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:29:50 -0500

We have a home grown system we were going to rewrite and then
found that Oracle's OAAM product had a lot of the features
we specified in the new design proposal in addition to giving
us a way to deploy wide-spread enhanced authentication and
risk based access control options so we're using that. We're early
in the requirements validation and design phase so I don't have
any documents for you.

You can see the original design proposal we were using when
contemplating a rewrite of the current system at:

www.jmu.edu/computing/security/info/accountmgmt.ppt



SCHALIP, MICHAEL wrote:
Are you using a specific product or suite to do this?  Or is this all homegrown?  Have you put your whole process down on 
paper yet?.....(something we're struggling with - and anxious to see what others have done....and documented....)

Thanks,

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Gary 
Flynn
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:31 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: (***POSSIBLE SPAM***) Re: [SECURITY] Self-service password reset approaches

We're currently using question/answer pairs but we're implementing a
new system that can support out of band email and cellphone confirmation
if we choose to enable it. Lots of policy and procedure discussions remain
though.

We've also been talking about various fall-back scenarios when
questions, cellphones, tokens, and other self-service means fail.

In the non-cyber world, we identify people by looking at their faces and
identity cards.

In the age of the internet and widespread webcams on almost every
device, why not have a person wanting to prove their identity call the
helpdesk while in front of a web cam. The helpdesk would have
access to a database of peoples' pictures. The helpdesk would ask the
individual to hold up their ID in front of the camera. A 'wiggle two
fingers' or similar request could confirm a live image.

The ID couldn't be verified as closely for tampering but I'd think the
process would still be more accurate than question/answer pairs. It
puts some responsibility on the helpdesk staff but they'd be doing
more or less the same thing if the person was at the desk in person.

Thoughts?



--
Gary Flynn
Security Engineer
James Madison University


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Current thread: