Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Federal Rules of Evidence
From: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:47:17 -0400
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:17:35 -0000, Russ Leathe said:
+1, thanks!
People - trim irrelevant parts of text when you reply. Some of these things are now pushing 40K and two embedded images - neither of which apply to the person replying. Yes, I know most of you are forced at gunpoint to use MUAs that insist on top-quoting and make it difficult to trim stuff. But it doesn't have to be that way...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence, (continued)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Daniel Bennett (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Parmenus Bowler (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Madamas Sotiris (Sep 06)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Wayne Bullock (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Myers, Julie (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Purvis, Cameron (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Schattle, Donald (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Justice, Connie F (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Spahr, Todd M. (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Russ Leathe (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Dave Koontz (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Mark Boolootian (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence John Ladwig (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Ken Connelly (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Valdis Kletnieks (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Robert Lau (Sep 05)
- Re: Federal Rules of Evidence Gary Flynn (Sep 05)