Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Video Surveillance Requirements
From: Ozzie Paez <ozpaez () SPRYNET COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:06 -0700
Ed, One thing you should keep in mind is whether someone could use your video system to stalk another person, spy on them, etc. Once you open the video stream to non-campus people, you basically have no control over it. Within the campus you should be able to leverage existing policies on proper use, but outside the campus community you really have no authority. I would be concerned over civil liability, so consult with an attorney and make sure that you are not leaving the institution at risk should something happen. At this point it can be argued that there is much confusion as to the level of privacy one can expect in a quasi-public place like an exercise room that only some people can use. Beyond that, would you expect to have some privacy in such a space if you find yourself alone? We are in the process of building a body of case law that can inform us as to what is reasonable and permissible, civilly and criminally, when it comes to hidden surveillance, so the question for any institution is whether they want to potentially become a test case, Ozzie Paez SSE/SAIC 303-332-5363 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Hudson, Edward Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:58 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] Video Surveillance Requirements (Apologies for cross posting) Our campus has a new student recreation center, run by our Associated Students. The building has many surveillance cameras -- in the weight room, exercise class rooms, cardio room, outside the locker room, etc. Currently the facility has NO sign on the front door indicating that the building is under video surveillance. The AS is now interested in putting two of the video feeds on their public website so that students can check to see how busy the facility is, before they head over to work out. The images are still (taken every 3 seconds) and only about 2 inches square. However, if you look at the source code for the page you can navigate to the two cameras and zoom in on the images. The website is open to the public at large, not just the campus community. We feel that having the images available to the public could raise privacy concerns and represents a personal security risk. You could effectively monitor the comings and goings of individuals or simply 'watch' when they are exercising. We do not currently have a policy related to video surveillance, but think one is needed. What issues do you think this situation presents? Has anyone faced a similar situation? We have been told that there are legal requirements for signage however coming up short on an actual citation in that regard. TIA Ed Hudson, CISM Information Security Office California State University, Chico www.csuchico.edu/ires/security Office: (530) 898-6307 Cell: 707-799-3250 ewhudson () csuchico edu
Current thread:
- Video Surveillance Requirements Hudson, Edward (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Flynn, Gerald (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Gary Dobbins (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Hudson, Edward (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Ozzie Paez (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Patrick P Murphy (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Patrick Ouellette (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Willis Marti (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements randy marchany (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Tracy Mitrano (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Drews, Jane E (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Lorenz, Eva (Jan 14)
- Re: Video Surveillance Requirements Joel Rosenblatt (Jan 14)