Re: Conflicker/NMAP

["Bradley, Stephen W. Mr." <bradlesw () MUOHIO EDU>]

Yet another example of why some users of this list would like to see it limited to only .edu personnel.


steve

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of 
Stanclift, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:45 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP

Glad to see I was not the only one who thought that when I was reading.


Michael Stanclift
Network Analyst
Rockhurst University

http://help.rockhurst.edu
(816) 501-4231


-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Basgen, 
Brian
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:40 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP

Dennis,

 While critiquing software security solutions, you may want to point out that your company sells hardware security 
solutions.

 I don't know how many other security vendors are on this list, but your list item #3 is flame bait. Please refrain 
from doing that.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brian Basgen
Information Security
Pima Community College




From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Dennis 
Meharchand
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:30 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP

Believing that Anti Virus/Endpoint Security Solutions can reliably detect known malware is itself a false positive.
In a recent comprehensive test on known malware Symantec failed 17.6% of the time and McAfee 22.3% of the time - they 
failed to detect malware that they knew about.

We can assume that they fail near 100% of the time on new unknown malware.

Here's a revised mitigation list:
1. Lock it up (the boot image) to eliminate drive by attacks
2. Patch (not that necessary if 1. Is done but still a good thing)
3. Endpoint Software Solutions (mostly do nothing but makes folks feel good) - occasional full disk scan may have some 
benefit

Dennis Meharchand
CEO, Valt.X Technologies Inc.
Cell: 416-618-4622
Tel: 1-800-361-0067, 416-746-6669
Fax: 416-746-2774
Email: dennis () valtx com
Web: www.valtx.com

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Jerry 
Sell
Sent: March 31, 2009 10:50 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP

There are three things that mitigate the Confickr worm.

1. Up to date Virus protection. All of the major vendors and most of the small vendors have signatures that will detect 
and remove Confickr.
2. Up to date patches or blocking for port 445.
3. Having autorun disabled for USB devices.

We have not detected anything so far using the scs scanner, but we have all three of these in place.

Thank you,

Jerry Sell, CISSP
Security Analyst
Brigham Young University
(801)422-2730
Jerry_Sell () byu edu


From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Harris, 
Michael C.
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:27 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP

Using both the Python scs scanner and the Nmap method we have had unbelievable results as well.  Enough to make me 
question both scanning methods.  I have not yet infected a machine in quarantine and scanned it to prove the false 
negative. if I can prove that either way I'll post again later today.

Mike
University of Missouri

________________________________________
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of 
Consolvo, Corbett D
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:22 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: [SECURITY] Conflicker/NMAP
I realize many folks may not want to answer this, but has anyone had many positives/infections with the released nmap 
scan for Conflicker?  So far we seem to be coming up clean and many other folks I've talked to or emailed with have 
come up clean as well.  I'm just concerned about the possibility of false negatives.  Of course, the problem may not be 
particularly wide-spread except in the eyes of some media outlets.

Thanks,
Corbett Consolvo
Texas State University