Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: OS Vuln Scanners


From: Han Lievens <han.lievens () MAIL CUNY EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:37:22 -0400

We use eEye Retina for scheduled scans and reporting - runs on Windows
only and non-customizable reports.
I use Nessus for concentrated scanning for more detail and file
content checking - awesome.

We are also in the process of deploying Core Impact for pen-testing
select "probably vulnerable" machines - runs on Windows XP and Vista
only.

What is up with all these Windows-only security apps??

Han.

Han Lievens
Information Security Office
The City University of New York
555 West 57th St., 16th Floor
New York, NY 10019
(212)541-0353
http://security.cuny.edu

On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Brian Epstein wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

For us it is primarily Nessus.  It is great and the price is right.  I
used Core Security's Core Impact for a number of years.  It is very
nice, but the price is definitely not comparable to Nessus.

If you are looking for advanced pen testing, Metasploit's Framework
has
worked very nicely.  Again, pricepoint is ideal.

Thanks,
Brian

- --
Brian Epstein <bepstein () ias edu>                     +1 609-734-8179
Network and Security Officer            Institute for Advanced Study
Key fingerprint = 128A 38F4 4CFA 5EDB 99CE  4734 6117 4C25 0371 C12A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFICQ/PYRdMJQNxwSoRAkv3AKCcs3y6Eu/8MQVln8zr5Z2W4dUMBQCfRdWV
hk7zZGg//m5xZJJ8VHEty+o=
=SfWx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread: