Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: OS Vuln Scanners
From: Brian Epstein <bepstein () IAS EDU>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:17:03 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For us it is primarily Nessus. It is great and the price is right. I used Core Security's Core Impact for a number of years. It is very nice, but the price is definitely not comparable to Nessus. If you are looking for advanced pen testing, Metasploit's Framework has worked very nicely. Again, pricepoint is ideal. Thanks, Brian - -- Brian Epstein <bepstein () ias edu> +1 609-734-8179 Network and Security Officer Institute for Advanced Study Key fingerprint = 128A 38F4 4CFA 5EDB 99CE 4734 6117 4C25 0371 C12A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFICQ/PYRdMJQNxwSoRAkv3AKCcs3y6Eu/8MQVln8zr5Z2W4dUMBQCfRdWV hk7zZGg//m5xZJJ8VHEty+o= =SfWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- OS Vuln Scanners Kevin Lanning (Apr 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Tumas, Jay (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Rick Holland (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Aaron Kirby (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners John Ladwig (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Curt Wilson (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Brian Epstein (Apr 18)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Kevin Halgren (Apr 22)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Ferris, Joe (Apr 22)
- Re: OS Vuln Scanners Han Lievens (Apr 23)