Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: E-Signatures
From: Harrold Ahole <madman () MYEASTSIDE COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:42:35 -0800
Faith Mcgrath wrote:
I am also interested in what people are using for electronic signatures if they need to certify that they are in compliance with FDA Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures regs -- 21 CFR Part 11 (http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/part11/). I am just being to do some background reading on the requirements, but we are beginning to see this requirement related to pharmaceutical research protocols. Thanks. -fm
21 CFR Part 11 is something entirely different and is more involved (harder to implement). Certainly if you are doing FDA work with pharma, you'll need to investigate this. But nothing like that is required for basic contracts where only US Esign Act comes into play and is far easier to comply with, allowing you to balance risks with how much certainty user authentication is valid. For example, if a student were to turn in a paper or fax a document to you, you'd likely have no way to authenticate the student's handwritten signature (rarely is a notary involved, and handwriting expertise is even rarer with signature cards to compare with pretty rare), yet such signed paper documents are accepted all the time. If you compare handwritten signatures with student IDs, then you'd want something similar online in which the student authenticates first. Harry
Current thread:
- E-Signatures Daniel Adinolfi (Jan 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: E-Signatures Valdis Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Harrold Ahole (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Faith Mcgrath (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Harrold Ahole (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Curt Wilson (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Randy Marchany (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Sarah Stevens (Jan 10)
- Re: E-Signatures Ozzie Paez (Jan 11)
- Re: E-Signatures Sarah Stevens (Jan 11)
- Re: E-Signatures Ozzie Paez (Jan 11)
- Re: E-Signatures David Grisham (Jan 30)