Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Password Security
From: "Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl)" <mclaugkl () UCMAIL UC EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:57:58 -0400
Thanks Gene. As always I appreciate your view and response on items! One of my biggest fears is to have one of the national news agencies show this card on TV and then pan to a shot of me where they proceed to ask the question "why did your department allow the University to do this"..... my second biggest fear is having to answer the same question from anyone who was the victim of a crime due to someone stealing their "password card". -Kevin Kevin L. McLaughlin CISM, CISSP, PMP, ITIL Master Certified Director, Information Security University of Cincinnati 513-556-9177 (w) 513-703-3211 (m) 513-558-ISEC (department) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and its content is confidential, intended solely for the addressee, and may be legally privileged. Access to this message and its content by any individual or entity other than those identified in this message is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution of this e-mail may be unlawful. Any action taken or omitted due to the content of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. -----Original Message----- From: Gene Spafford [mailto:spaf () CERIAS PURDUE EDU] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:13 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Password Security Simplest argument? If an employee has identity/assets/benefits stolen as a result of theft of one of these cards, there is no shortage of experts who could testify -- in a negligence lawsuit against the university -- that it is known bad practice to write sensitive passwords where they can be found. That could mean increased damages against the university from any aggrieved employee. Oh, and now that this threat is online, any aggrieved employees (or their attorneys) will be able to find it to help identify said experts and show that the university had prior notice. So, as with any standard risk management, it is up to university authorities to decide if it is worth the risk of losing a messy, expensive lawsuit that might be enabled by their policy. :-)
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Password Security Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Oct 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Password Security Samuel Young (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Gary Dobbins (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Wyman Miles (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Sarah Stevens (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Gene Spafford (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Vicky Walker (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Roger Safian (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Logan, Kimberly (loganks) (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Steven Alexander (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Jim Dillon (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Doug Markiewicz (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Jim Dillon (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security David Seidl (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Vicky Walker (Oct 23)
- Re: Password Security Christopher Webber (Oct 23)
- Password Security Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Oct 24)
- Re: Password Security David Kovarik (Oct 24)
(Thread continues...)