Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: spam return address backlash
From: Russell Fulton <r.fulton () AUCKLAND AC NZ>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:14:51 +1300
H. Morrow Long wrote:
When it comes to receiving and relaying telephone messages for their parents some children function as a write-only recording mechanism (or null sink).
Goodness! I'm shocked! -- I thought it was just my kids. I also have problems with false ACKs, with subsequent repudiation -- acknowledgement that message was received when subsequent events indicate it never was and the recipient vigorously denies it was ever delivered. Russell.
Current thread:
- Re: spam return address backlash, (continued)
- Re: spam return address backlash Russell Fulton (Jan 10)
- Re: spam return address backlash Cal Frye (Jan 10)
- Re: spam return address backlash Roger Safian (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Jeff Giacobbe (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Roger Safian (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash H. Morrow Long (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Cal Frye (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Roger Safian (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Cal Frye (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Paul Russell (Jan 11)
- Re: spam return address backlash Russell Fulton (Jan 12)
- Re: spam return address backlash Cal Frye (Jan 13)