Re: spam return address backlash

[Cal Frye <cjf () CALFRYE COM>]

 Roger Safian ventured to comment, at 1/11/07 3:31 PM:
> ... we would still have to receive
> the bounced messages, while potentially not generating them ourselves.
> Seems like the worse of both worlds.
>
> If that's not correct, please let me know.

That's true, but you can just consider it a favor you do for the community ;-)
I should add that not all mail servers /can be/ configured this way, either.

--
Regards,
-- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.calfrye.com,  www.pitalabs.com