Re: Image SPAM Increase?

[Gary Flynn <flynngn () JMU EDU>]

Joe St Sauver wrote:

> If you're running SpamAssassin or a SpamAssassin derivative, the
> weights associated with SpamAssassin tests should not be taken as
> cast in stone. Adjusting suitable tests upwards may be all you need
> to take care of the issue.

I'll check but I don't think our Mirapoint systems currently
give us the capability to tune the underlying SpamAssassin
engine. Also, I'm told our Mirapoint configuration is set
to use Rapid-antiSPAM as an engine rather than SpamAssassin
but I guess that could be changed.

A question for those of you running tunable anti-spam solutions...

How often do you find it necessary to tune?

thanks,

--
Gary Flynn
Security Engineer
James Madison University
www.jmu.edu/computing/security

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature