Dailydave mailing list archives

anonymized


From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunitysec com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:16:48 -0400

Dave, please anonymize, thanks:
---

To reiterate what Rodney said, just because companies like iDefense and
Fatelabs have government contracts doesn't make them a viable security
company. All too often, it ends up being more hype than product
especially
when the marketing team starts saying they have a government contract [
most likely with the Department of Education ] but because of an NDA
they
can't say who it is. Also for those of us out there who have ever
audited a
government network, lets remember that in most cases the network is wide
open otherwise how would have people like Marc "I'm gonna roll you
motherf*cker" Maiffret or Chris "I cat manpages into a book for OReilly"
McNab got their start into this lucrative security business.

But putting flames aside, I'm highly critical of "black box" or closed
source technologies that provide security. If they really want to get
some
recognition, they should at the very least explain some of the technical
underpinnings of the tool because for all we know it could be Windows
port
of Grsecurity PRODUCT or PaX. Just my two cents.

Cheers

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At 04:00 PM 8/26/2004 -0600, Bradley, Terry (CONTR) wrote:
Anyone have any experience with this product?  The article makes it
sound like the best thing since Microsoft(r) Bob(tm)...

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/0816/news-agencies-08-16-04.asp

The web site makes it sound like a Host IDS that's
better, stronger, and faster due to being built by some
military-industrial complext type folks who don't appear
to have any experience building Host IDS'

It's not on my Host IDS list (and I'm on the product review
team for Network World that reviews such things) so I have
strong urges to make some Dave-esque comment like "they can't
have clue, they're not in my office doorway asking me
to review their product" but in reality that's too harsh
for civilized company.

I don't care what street addresses in the District of Columbia
uses their product.  Prove to me it stops - and logs -
everything Canvas can throw at a target it's allegedly defending
and I'll start considering it to be for real.

There are a lot of Host IDS products out there.  Some of them
are complete crap.  Some of them "fail to suck" sufficiently
to use.  This one ain't on the radar so I don't know what
category it fits in.

Those of us working in the private sector find it quite tedious
to have a vendor hopping up and down in our faces claiming their
stuff must be good because they conned someone into letting
them suck at the government teat which has "Department of Homeland
Security"
tattoed on it.  Without meaning any disrespect to the fine folks
who drive them for a living, I don't give a DAMN if the thing
runs on a Hum-Vee - show me a normal computer running the stuff.


_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave


Current thread: