Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Wireless Security vs Performance
From: shailesh.sf () gmail com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:43:14 -0600
If Security is the criteria, then I would suggest you should be using WPA2 rather than WEP. WEP with the now infamous RC4 Stream Cipher is/ was a security nightmare. WPA2 uses AES Block Cipher with a 256 Bit Key and currently their aren't any known compromising attacks against it. As regards to the cipher, AES remains secure & unconquered while the 256 Bit Key is completely immune to any brute force attack(s). You may also wanna check NIST SP 800-48 that deals specifically with Wireless Security. Regards, Shailesh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance shailesh . sf (Sep 10)
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance Adam Mooz (Sep 10)
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance Paul Johnston (Sep 13)
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance Archangel Amael (Sep 14)
- RE: Wireless Security vs Performance Toby Reynolds (Sep 13)
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance Paul Johnston (Sep 13)
- RE: Wireless Security vs Performance Matthew Reed (Sep 10)
- Re: Wireless Security vs Performance Adam Mooz (Sep 10)