Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack?
From: Kawa <kekon () tele2 se>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
You are always vulnerable to attacks, thats how it works. Specially if it is kids using the computers. But having firewall and EMBC is making the risk alot less.. Mehmet cdunn wrote:
Hi, I work in a school in nottingham, UK we access the internet via the EMBC who inter-connect all schools and colleges to the internet. The EMBC manage our site blocking and spam filters for E-Mail. The proxy we use to access the net is heavily filtered and all un-used ports are closed, making an attack as far as I can see VERY difficult. My question is just how vulnerable is our school network? is there still potential there for an attack to take place? or would this be so difficult and the rewards to few for an attacker to bother? Thanks Craig Dunn
----- http://www.registryheal.com Registry Cleaner -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Am-I-still-vulnerable-to-attack--tp15817856p16048135.html Sent from the Security Basics mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Current thread:
- Am I still vulnerable to attack? cdunn (Mar 03)
- RE: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Jesse Rink (Mar 04)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? p1g (Mar 04)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Logan Douglas (Mar 04)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? mgk.mailing (Mar 04)
- RE: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Craig Wright (Mar 04)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? John Ballard (Mar 05)
- RE: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Craig Wright (Mar 04)
- RE: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Christian Campbell (Mar 04)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Nathan Addison User (Mar 05)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Kawa (Mar 14)
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Razi Shaban (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Yousif (Mar 04)
- RE: Am I still vulnerable to attack? Christian Campbell (Mar 05)