Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: recommendations for centrally managed corporate antivirus solution


From: "Mason, Samuel" <SMason () mt gov>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:18:43 -0700

We recently changed from McAfee to ESET's NOD32. I highly recommend it. Management and alerting is good and the client 
itself is pretty small and quick.

Samuel Mason CISSP, GCFA

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Mike Hale
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:20 PM
To: illuminaeti () gmail com
Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: recommendations for centrally managed corporate antivirus solution

We just rolled out TrendMicro at my last company.

It worked fairly well.

On 14 Feb 2008 15:38:41 -0000, illuminaeti () gmail com
<illuminaeti () gmail com> wrote:
Hi list


On the different networks I manage, I've been using Symantec corporate since version 7. I've never had any major 
issues with it until now.


Version 11, now called "Symantec endpoint Protection" requires IIS and either MS SQL or the symantec embedded 
database. I installed a copy on a test server and it just about crippled it. Network access from clients was 
incredibly slow and processor use was hitting %100. I've heard the same comments from a collegue who installed it on 
a new server at the customer's request. The file server was virtually unusable even before the client was installed 
on the workstation. Also the new GUI is just plain awful.



 I don't have the time or resources to tweak settings to get better performance out of the AV.

 I've heard good things about NOD32, Sophos and Kaspersky.  I've started looking around and of course, every website 
I visit tells me the software they sell is the best in the universe.


So, looking for real answers from real users, I thought I'd ask you all about your experience, positive or negative, 
with various corporate antivirus software.


Thanks in advance.






--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0


Current thread: