Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RE: Laptop security
From: aaarugrat () hotmail com
Date: 22 Feb 2007 22:20:06 -0000
The only problem with this, is that if you require a user to replace an expensive asset. You will lose not only the asset (as it's difficult to force payment), but likely the employee as well. In almost all cases, the value of possible sensitive data, and the value of the employee outweighs the value of the hardware by a huge amount. If this is not the case, then the asset should never have been issued in the first place. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: BigFix If your IT fails, you're out of business - or worse. Arm your enterprise with BigFix, the single converged IT security and operations engine. BigFix enables continuous discovery, assessment, remediation, and enforcement for complex and distributed IT environments in real-time from a single console. Think what's next. Think BigFix. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;82309979;15562032;o?http://www.bigfix.com/ITNext/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Laptop security, (continued)
- Re: Laptop security killy (Feb 22)
- Re: Laptop security Paul daSilva (Feb 21)
- RE: Laptop security Karthikeyan Mohanakrishnan, ASDC Chennai (Feb 21)
- Re: Laptop security HF (Feb 22)
- Re: Laptop security Tyler Krpata (Feb 22)
- Message not available
- RE: Laptop security WALI (Feb 26)
- RE: Laptop security Nick Duda (Feb 26)
- RE: Laptop security WALI (Feb 26)
- Re: Laptop security steve . dake (Feb 21)
- Re: Laptop security kevin fielder (Feb 22)
- Re: Laptop security dlandru (Feb 23)
- Re: RE: Laptop security aaarugrat (Feb 23)
- Re: RE: Laptop security spad78 (Feb 23)
- RE: Laptop security Andre Gorvel (Feb 26)
- RE: Laptop security Warren V Camp (Feb 26)