Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: terminal server security vs vpn
From: Chandresh Dedhia <ChandreshD () shoppersstop co in>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:53:14 +0530
Hi, Has anybody used Portwise??? Thanks & Regards Chandresh Dedhia -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Chris Barber Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:48 AM To: Juan B Cc: security basics Subject: Re: terminal server security vs vpn Juan, If you use SSL-VPN you will not need a client, or at worst you will not be required to install a client before you can make the connection. The only thing needed from that standpoint is a browser. This makes VPN more "Web Like" and easier on the user, without compromising your security. i would contact one of the loacl resellers in your area and ask for a demo Cisco, Juniper, Aventail and Checkpoint all have SSL-VPN solutions that are quite nice. I prefer the Juniper myself. Hope this helps Chris. On 8/13/07, Juan B <juanbabi () yahoo com> wrote:
Hi, I am looking for a solution to my users so they can log in from home and work connect to there office pc's, of course I will use terminlal server. My question is, why to use double encryption, why use vpn client to connect to the corporate FW and then to connect throw it with a ts session, AFAIK Ts is encrypted as well and one can set the encryption to high which is the same as VPN right? I want to nake the connection simple to the user and securure. do I need also a vpn client, I guess not, am I missing something here? I will also change the port to increase security. Thanks a lot, Juan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/
This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
Current thread:
- terminal server security vs vpn Juan B (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Chandresh Dedhia (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Brent Kern (Aug 14)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Beauford, Jason (Aug 13)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Deno Vichas (Aug 13)
- RE: terminal server security vs vpn Mngadi, Simphiwe (SS) (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Isaac Perez (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Brian Loe (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn abhicc285 (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn nobledark (Aug 14)
- Re: terminal server security vs vpn Chris Barber (Aug 13)