Security Basics mailing list archives
Different Outputs using different Portscanners...
From: "jjohnmck () bigpond net au" <themac () bigpond net au>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 11:20:59 +0800
Hi, I used two different portscanners to scan my labs range and a got a variety of results: (1) nmap using -sS flag on Linux (2) Superscan in windows Superscan seemed to pick up some of the fixup protocols that are in enabled (but not necessarily in use), but nmap didnt.. Any thoughts or similar experiences? The firewall used is a soho PIX 506E -6.2(2) Gards, Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FastTrain has your solution for a great CISSP Boot Camp. The industry's most recognized corporate security certification track, provides a comprehensive prospectus based upon the core principle concepts of security. This ALL INCLUSIVE curriculum utilizes lectures, case studies and true hands-on utilization of pertinent security tools. For a limited time you can enter for a chance to win one of the latest technological innovations, the SEGWAY HT. Log onto http://www.securityfocus.com/FastTrain-security-basics ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Different Outputs using different Portscanners... jjohnmck () bigpond net au (May 02)
- Re: Different Outputs using different Portscanners... Karma (May 05)
- Re: Different Outputs using different Portscanners... Gene Yoo (May 05)