RE: sshd for windows

["DeGennaro, Gregory" <Gregory_DeGennaro () csaa com>]

It sounds like the machines matter most because I used vnc over a LAN and it
was slow?  And that was without a ssh tunnel!


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Berry [mailto:compjma () hotmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:09 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: sshd for windows

> From: "DeGennaro, Gregory" <Gregory_DeGennaro () csaa com>
> (or both if you're really paranoid.) << Talking about slow?! ... LOL ...
>
> Double 3DES Tunnels (SSH and VPN) ... Let's see, that is up to 68% 
> reduction
> in bandwidth, plus the overhead that VNC has.  That would be quite
> interesting?
>
> Definitely more secure than usual!
>
> Maybe all SMP machines and an OC-3 or LAN, then maybe you will have decent
> speeds and usability... :-D

Actually the bandwidth isn't that big a deal, even on a T1 (much less an 
OC-3), and the latency isn't really changed at all, which is the important 
part in my opinion.  Don't try this over a modem, but for any broadband 
connection it's fine.

Chris Berry
compjma () hotmail com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"Within every man beats a heart of darkness." --The Shadow


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
     
Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
          
Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------