Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: sshd for windows


From: "Chris Berry" <compjma () hotmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:08:35 -0700

From: "DeGennaro, Gregory" <Gregory_DeGennaro () csaa com>
(or both if you're really paranoid.) << Talking about slow?! ... LOL ...

Double 3DES Tunnels (SSH and VPN) ... Let's see, that is up to 68% reduction
in bandwidth, plus the overhead that VNC has.  That would be quite
interesting?

Definitely more secure than usual!

Maybe all SMP machines and an OC-3 or LAN, then maybe you will have decent
speeds and usability... :-D

Actually the bandwidth isn't that big a deal, even on a T1 (much less an OC-3), and the latency isn't really changed at all, which is the important part in my opinion. Don't try this over a modem, but for any broadband connection it's fine.

Chris Berry
compjma () hotmail com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"Within every man beats a heart of darkness." --The Shadow

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: