RE: sshd for windows

["DeGennaro, Gregory" <Gregory_DeGennaro () csaa com>]

(or both if you're really paranoid.) << Talking about slow?! ... LOL ... 

Double 3DES Tunnels (SSH and VPN) ... Let's see, that is up to 68% reduction
in bandwidth, plus the overhead that VNC has.  That would be quite
interesting?

Definitely more secure than usual!

Maybe all SMP machines and an OC-3 or LAN, then maybe you will have decent
speeds and usability... :-D



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Berry [mailto:compjma () hotmail com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:55 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: sshd for windows

> From: "Depp, Dennis M." <deppdm () ornl gov>
> I really like VNC, but it has little security and no encryption.

Which is why you pipe it through SSH or a VPN. (or both if you're really 
paranoid.)

Chris Berry
compjma () hotmail com
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
     
Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
          
Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------