Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: [security] VPN vs changing routes
From: Martin <martin () i2net com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:52:57 -0700
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:44 am, Keenan Smith wrote: My understanding of it is that with a VPN solution you are creating an encrypted tunnel over the internet between 2 points. With your solution you are routing traffic from a remote LAN to a local LAN with no encryption. I guess it depends on what sort of traffic you are going to have, and if you would want people to see what it is you are transfering. What i am picturing is that you would have a T1 connection for each location to the internet, from different providers, and you owning and controlling the programming on the routers.
All, Given a single user in a single location with a static IP, besides encryption, what would be the difference between using a VPN to connect to the corporate network vs. changing the routing to make the corporate network the first hop? It seems to me that the latter combined with a firewall rule and NAT would function the same way as a VPN without the overhead. So other than encapsulating all data between the network and the VPN client, is there any advantage to using the VPN over a change in routing? Thanks in advance for all the good advice. KC Smith ~~~Ensuring that suave and debonair sophistication is always a part of IT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts! The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare. Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance. Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology, (continued)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Erik Vincent (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Daniel B. Cid (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Chris Berry (Jun 10)
- RE: Firewall and DMZ topology David Gillett (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Erik Vincent (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Zach Crowell (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Erik Vincent (Jun 10)
- VPN vs changing routes Keenan Smith (Jun 10)
- Re: VPN vs changing routes chort (Jun 10)
- RE: VPN vs changing routes David Gillett (Jun 10)
- Re: [security] VPN vs changing routes Martin (Jun 11)
- Re: VPN vs changing routes Joerg Over Dexia (Jun 11)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Daniel B. Cid (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Steve Bremer (Jun 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Daniel B. Cid (Jun 10)
- Re: Firewall and DMZ topology Aaron Fisher (Jun 11)