Re: New official link-layer type request

[Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>]

Hmm In wouldn't want to ask for a new group but from all the those groups,  opsawg seems somehow appropriate, or maybe 
not?
-- 
Damir Franusic

http://socket.hr
http://github.com/dfranusic

On May 17, 2019 10:26:42 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net> wrote:
> On May 17, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > I apologize for my previous mail, issues with email client. What I
> wanted to ask is whether I should name the draft like this:
> > draft-dfranusic-tsvwg-elee-00
>
> See
>
>       https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/guidelines/#7
>
> If you're targeting this spec for the Transport Area Working Group, the
> "tsvwg-" would be appropriate; however, the page for that working
> group:
>
>       https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/tsvwg/about/
>
> indicates that it's for things such as "Maintenance of the Stream
> Control Transmission Protocol", not for all protocols that happen to
> run on top of SCTP.
>
> Doing a Google search for
>
>       "lawful intercept" site:ietf.org
>
> doesn't seem to indicate that there's one particular working group that
> handles all lawful intercept issues, so you'd have to figure out the
> appropriate WG yourself.
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers