tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: New official link-layer type request


From: Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 20:34:49 +0200

I apologize for my previous mail, issues with email client. What I wanted to ask is whether I should name the draft 
like this:

draft-dfranusic-tsvwg-elee-00

Thanks,
-- 
Damir Franusic

http://socket.hr
http://github.com/dfranusic

On May 17, 2019 8:29:34 PM GMT+02:00, Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Guy

I have a question regarding the target working group. Since this is a 
Link Layer transport protocol
for Lawful Interception Data which can also use SCTP for transport, 
should I use the following naming
scheme**instead:***draft-dfranusic-**tsvwg-00 *


What you you suggest?

*
*

On 5/15/19 9:08 AM, Damir Franusic wrote:
Hi Guy

I just made a little TOC change in the draft but that's all. Version
00 is there and you can link it and it with a new LINKTYPE_ELEE.


http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=http://socket.hr/draft-dfranusic-elee-00.xml&modeAsFormat=html/ascii


On May 12, 2019 11:00:16 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
wrote:
On May 12, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Damir Franusic
<damir.franusic () gmail com>
wrote:

That would be great thanks. That's all I ever wanted really, but
now
I understand the relevance of having a proper I-D.

It will also be useful for documenting the protocol when run over
SCTP.

Are you planning on running the protocol through the IETF standards
process:

    https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/

or did you just use the I-D format for convenience (or because
that's
how the pcapng spec is being done - we may submit it as an I-D at
some
point)?

And yes, you are correct regarding the Header/PDU; quite simple.
Great - thanks!  So shall we link to that draft, for now?
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Current thread: