tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: New official link-layer type request
From: Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 20:34:49 +0200
I apologize for my previous mail, issues with email client. What I wanted to ask is whether I should name the draft like this: draft-dfranusic-tsvwg-elee-00 Thanks, -- Damir Franusic http://socket.hr http://github.com/dfranusic On May 17, 2019 8:29:34 PM GMT+02:00, Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Guy I have a question regarding the target working group. Since this is a Link Layer transport protocol for Lawful Interception Data which can also use SCTP for transport, should I use the following naming scheme**instead:***draft-dfranusic-**tsvwg-00 * What you you suggest? * * On 5/15/19 9:08 AM, Damir Franusic wrote:Hi Guy I just made a little TOC change in the draft but that's all. Version00 is there and you can link it and it with a new LINKTYPE_ELEE.http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=http://socket.hr/draft-dfranusic-elee-00.xml&modeAsFormat=html/asciiOn May 12, 2019 11:00:16 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>wrote:On May 12, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Damir Franusic<damir.franusic () gmail com>wrote:That would be great thanks. That's all I ever wanted really, butnowI understand the relevance of having a proper I-D. It will also be useful for documenting the protocol when run overSCTP.Are you planning on running the protocol through the IETF standards process: https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/ or did you just use the I-D format for convenience (or becausethat'show the pcapng spec is being done - we may submit it as an I-D atsomepoint)?And yes, you are correct regarding the Header/PDU; quite simple.Great - thanks! So shall we link to that draft, for now?
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: New official link-layer type request, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 11)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 11)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 15)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Message not available
- Re: New official link-layer type request Michael Richardson (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)