Re: New official link-layer type request

[Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>]

Hi Guy

I have a question regarding the target working group. Since this is a 
Link Layer transport protocol
for Lawful Interception Data which can also use SCTP for transport, 
should I use the following naming
scheme**instead:***draft-dfranusic-**tsvwg-00 *


What you you suggest?

*
*

On 5/15/19 9:08 AM, Damir Franusic wrote:
> Hi Guy
>
> I just made a little TOC change in the draft but that's all. Version 00 is there and you can link it and it with a new 
> LINKTYPE_ELEE.
>
> http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=http://socket.hr/draft-dfranusic-elee-00.xml&modeAsFormat=html/ascii
>
>
> On May 12, 2019 11:00:16 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net> wrote:
> > On May 12, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > That would be great thanks. That's all I ever wanted really, but now
> > I understand the relevance of having a proper I-D.
> >
> > It will also be useful for documenting the protocol when run over SCTP.
> >
> > Are you planning on running the protocol through the IETF standards
> > process:
> >
> >         https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/
> >
> > or did you just use the I-D format for convenience (or because that's
> > how the pcapng spec is being done - we may submit it as an I-D at some
> > point)?
> >
> > > And yes, you are correct regarding the Header/PDU; quite simple.
> > Great - thanks!  So shall we link to that draft, for now?

--
Damir Franusic

email: damir.franusic () gmail com
http://ele2.io/

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers