tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:32:12 -0700
(blah blah blah duplicate posts blah blah blah thunderbird blah blah blah multiple accounts blah blah blah)
Guy Harris wrote:
Looks good to me, at least for the top-of-tree (where we require that the platform support 64-bit integers, and where we define u_int64_t to be an unsigned 64-bit integer type).
Is the cpack.c stuff useful, or potentially useful, for anything other than the radiotap stuff? - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump David Young (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Bruce M Simpson (Sep 22)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Michael Richardson (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Michael Richardson (Sep 23)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 23)
- Re: x.9 branch Hannes Gredler (Sep 24)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 19)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump David Young (Sep 24)
- Re: "final" radiotap patch for tcpdump Guy Harris (Sep 25)