Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody?

[Martin Holste <mcholste () gmail com>]

> Don't apologize for starting the thread! It's made for some highly
> entertaining reading over the weekend. Here are some observations:

Entertaining reading indeed!  It takes passion to be good at security
(or anything, I suppose), and it's good to see there's no shortage.  I
said it earlier but it bears repeating: much respect to Sourcefire as
a company for participating in any kind of discussion.  It puts you
guys head and shoulders above the rest of your corporate competition.

As for the GPL SID's: My wish/vote is for ET to drop them entirely.  I
find very little value in them.  There may be a handful that are still
helpful, and those should be created as new SID's in the ET set.  Let
SF be the sole maintainer of the GPL sigs.  I think the greatest value
to novice IDS'ers would be to make them disabled by default so they
don't get bogged down in the FP's.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users