Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody?
From: "Weir, Jason" <jason.weir () nhrs org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:33:37 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: evilghost () packetmail net [mailto:evilghost () packetmail net] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:29 AM To: Matthew Jonkman Cc: Weir, Jason; emerging-sigs () emergingthreats net; snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Emerging-Sigs] [Snort-users] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody?
On 03/21/11 09:24, Matthew Jonkman wrote:Any other ideas?I do not like the idea of re-SIDing. It doesn't make sense, promotes unnecessary duplication, and can result in performance degradation and disparity between the GPL rules. In the spirit of the GPL, if you make changes, you submit said changes upstream. If we make improvements we should submit them to VRT, and vice versa. Their inclusion is up to VRT/ET respectively. I do not vote we re-SID. I do vote we preserve SID and communicate upstream/downstream on changes. A rational person would evaluate the changes, engage in mutual discussion, and agree on modifications. Re-SIDing is stupid.
evilghost - I agree that re-SIDing is stupid... But the rest of your suggestions require VRT and ET cooperate and have a healthy back in forth relationship. It seems clear that will never happen.. -J _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Please visit www.nhrs.org to subscribe to NHRS email announcements and updates. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody?, (continued)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matt Olney (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matt Olney (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Randal T. Rioux (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody? Weir, Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody? Weir, Jason (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody? Jacob Kitchel (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - whomaintainsthem?Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody? Martin Holste (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintainsthem?Nobody? Nigel Houghton (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them?Nobody? Victor Julien (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Matthew Jonkman (Mar 19)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Jason Brvenik (Mar 19)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? Joel Esler (Mar 21)
- Re: [Emerging-Sigs] GPL rules - who maintains them? Nobody? evilghost () packetmail net (Mar 21)