Secure Coding: by date
156 messages
starting Apr 02 06 and
ending Jun 26 06
Date index |
Thread index |
Author index
Sunday, 02 April
Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Crispin Cowan
Monday, 03 April
Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pascal Meunier
Segments, eh Smithers? Crispin Cowan
Tuesday, 04 April
Segments, eh Smithers? ljknews
Segments, eh Smithers? Michael S Hines
Segments, eh Smithers? der Mouse
Segments, eh Smithers? karger at watson.ibm.com
Segments, eh Smithers? Blue Boar
Segments, eh Smithers? Steven M. Bellovin
advice from the past Steven M. Bellovin
Segments, eh Smithers? Aleksander P. Czarnowski
Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Crispin Cowan
Wednesday, 05 April
Underhanded C contest Kenneth R. van Wyk
AJAX: Is your application secure enough? Kenneth R. van Wyk
Some different ways to authenticate people Glenn Everhart
Thursday, 06 April
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Dinis Cruz
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Dinis Cruz
[Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, Uservs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Dinis Cruz
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, Uservs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Dinis Cruz
Managed Code and Runtime Environments - Another layer of added security? Dinis Cruz
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code ljknews
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code ljknews
Friday, 07 April
4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code der Mouse
YAI (yet another interview) Gary McGraw
Tuesday, 18 April
IEEE S&P: malware Gary McGraw
Friday, 21 April
HNS - A Modular Approach to Data Validation in Web Applications Kenneth R. van Wyk
Tuesday, 25 April
Another example of the futility of hardwareless 2 factor authentication Glenn Everhart
Wednesday, 26 April
Another example of the futility of hardwareless 2 factor authentication der Mouse
Monday, 01 May
New security website: darkreading Gary McGraw
Secure Software Architecture, Design, Implementation and Assurance CFP Robert C. Seacord
Vista and the Type Safe missed oportunity (was Re: New security website: darkreading ) Dinis Cruz
Vista and the Type Safe missed oportunity (was Re: New security website: darkreading ) George Capehart
Tuesday, 02 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Wall, Kevin
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Jeff Williams
Wednesday, 03 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java David Eisner
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Wall, Kevin
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
Thursday, 04 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Kenneth R. van Wyk
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Gadi Evron
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Kenneth R. van Wyk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java David Eisner
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Tim Hollebeek
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Gary McGraw
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java David Eisner
[Owasp-dotnet] Re: By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Greenarrow 1
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Jeff Williams
Friday, 05 May
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 ljknews
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Gary McGraw
WSJ.com - Tech Companies Check Software Earlier for Flaws Kenneth R. van Wyk
Saturday, 06 May
Re: WSJ.com - Tech Companies Check Software Mark Graff
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 der Mouse
Sunday, 07 May
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Florian Weimer
Monday, 08 May
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Robert C. Seacord
HNS - Biggest X Window security hole since 2000 Tim Hollebeek
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Wall, Kevin
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Gary McGraw
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
Tuesday, 09 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Gary McGraw
Tech target interview Gary McGraw
Why Novell should take on the 'type-safe platform' challenge Dinis Cruz
Wednesday, 10 May
Black Hat class: Advanced Asp.Net Exploits and Countermeasures Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
Thursday, 11 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Jeff Williams
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java David Eisner
Friday, 12 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
Comment on Microsoft's leaked memos, and the unofficial end of Microsoft 'Trustworthy Computing' Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
Saturday, 13 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Stephen de Vries
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Gary McGraw
Sunday, 14 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Dinis Cruz
Robert Cringely on Type Safety (well sort of :) Dinis Cruz
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java Michael Silk
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java j lunerwood
Monday, 15 May
By default, the Verifier is disabled on .Net and Java leichter_jerrold at emc.com
New podcast (sneak preview) Gary McGraw
Tuesday, 16 May
More irony? Gary McGraw
Thursday, 18 May
Ajax one panel Gary McGraw
Saturday, 20 May
Ajax one panel Johan Peeters
Ajax one panel Gary McGraw
Sunday, 21 May
Ajax one panel Johan Peeters
Ajax one panel John Steven
Ajax one panel Johan Peeters
Ajax one panel Gary McGraw
Ajax one panel Johan Peeters
Tuesday, 23 May
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care Dinis Cruz
Wednesday, 24 May
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should ca re leichter_jerrold at emc.com
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care Andrew van der Stock
Ajax one panel Crispin Cowan
Thursday, 25 May
STL iterator vulnerabilities Robert C. Seacord
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care George Capehart
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care Stephen de Vries
Friday, 26 May
Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care Jeff Williams
Re: On sandboxes, and why you should care Jeff Williams
Friday, 02 June
Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
Sunday, 04 June
Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices ljknews
Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices Gunnar Peterson
Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices George Capehart
Monday, 05 June
Where are developers who know how to develop secure software? David A. Wheeler
Hiring folks that are familar with SC practices Peter G. Neumann
Where are developers who know how to develop secure software? Peter G. Neumann
Secure Application Protocol Design McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
SD Times Gary McGraw
Comparing Scanning Tools McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
Tuesday, 06 June
Secure Application Protocol Design Gunnar Peterson
Comparing Scanning Tools Joe Teff
Wednesday, 07 June
Reusable Security for Segmented Data Domains Stephen de Vries
Where are developers who know how to develop secure so ftware? leichter_jerrold at emc.com
Comparing Scanning Tools leichter_jerrold at emc.com
Comparing Scanning Tools McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
Samsung "gets it"! Goertzel Karen
Thursday, 08 June
Comparing Scanning Tools Gunnar Peterson
Comparing Scanning Tools Gary McGraw
Comparing Scanning Tools McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
SOA and security Gary McGraw
Comparing Scanning Tools Gunnar Peterson
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools Brian Chess
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools Brian Chess
Friday, 09 June
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools Gunnar Peterson
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools Dave Wichers
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools Jeremy Epstein
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools ljknews
Monday, 12 June
Silver Bullet: Dan Geer Gary McGraw
managed string library Robert C. Seacord
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) David A. Wheeler
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) Gary McGraw
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools Michael Mucha
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) Crispin Cowan
Tuesday, 13 June
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) David A. Wheeler
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) David A. Wheeler
Re: Comparing Scanning Tools (false positives) Johan Peeters
Wednesday, 14 June
Column -- "New Terrorist Profile: Phone Users" Kenneth R. van Wyk
RE: Comparing Scanning Tools John Steven
Wednesday, 21 June
Ajax security basics Kenneth Van Wyk
Ajax security basics Gunnar Peterson
Thursday, 22 June
Article -- IBM offers developers free security tools Kenneth Van Wyk
Monday, 26 June
OWASP PHP Top 5 Announcement Andrew van der Stock