Nmap Development mailing list archives
ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:32:00 +0100
Hi, Every reimplementation of netcat seems to try to break this syntax: nc -l -p 123 # listen on local port 123 GNU nc, openbsd's nc all have it broken. And ncat is no exception. "You too, Brutus". IIRC they even break it in different ways - they have different ways to specify local port: as a parameter to -l option, as a standalone port parameter etc... AARRGGHH... This makes users' lives harder for no apparent benefit. Can this be changed so that it works as it did in the original nc? For reference, nc-1.10 (original Hobbit's one) generally has these ways to specify local and remote ports: nc [opts] [-l] [-s LHOST] [-p LPORT] [RHOST RPORT] and this works the same with and without -l. Of course, without -l, RHOST RPORT is mandatory. If -l is specified, RHOST RPORT (if present) is interpreted as "the only address we receive connections from". In UDP case, nc simply executes connect() to that host/port, which limits incoming packets only to those from that address. In TCP case, it checks remote address after accept() and drop connections from non-matching addresses. -- vda _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 08)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 David Fifield (Jan 08)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Fyodor (Jan 08)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 09)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Kris Katterjohn (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Kris Katterjohn (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Kris Katterjohn (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 10)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Fyodor (Jan 12)
- Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10 Denys Vlasenko (Jan 09)