Re: ncat 5.10BETA handling of -l -p is not compatible with nc-1.10

[Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail com>]

On Monday 11 January 2010 23:05, David Fifield wrote:
> > That being said, I also agree with David that it would be reasonable
> > for us to just "do what the user wants" in the -l -p case.  At least
> > as long as the code change is simple.  I think a warning message would
> > still be warranted, at least in verbose mode.
>
> I committed the code to make -p set the listen port. I also made it an
> error if you try to give more than one port, like
>       ncat -l 80 443
>       ncat -l -p 80 443
> I don't know what to print as a warning. "You don't need the -p with
> Ncat"? It makes me think of Google's "Save time by hitting the return
> key instead of clicking on the search button."

Frankly, I did not think you'll do it.

Thanks!!!

--
vda
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/