Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:25:48 -0800
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:22:45PM -0600, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 6:18 PM, DePriest, Jason R. <> wrote:On Feb 5, 2008 6:04 PM, Fyodor <> wrote:On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:38:39PM -0600, Thomas Buchanan wrote:The end-user required DLLs from Thomas' instructions are sizes like so: libeay32.dll - 1,028,096 bytes ssleay32.dll - 200,704 bytes You'd still need other files for the actual compiling though. libeay32MT.lib - 667,648 bytes ssleay32MT.lib - 53,248 bytes and other files that are 'included' -JasonSince NSIS supports LZMA compression, you can get the DLLs down to 352,256 bytes and 73,728 bytes respectively assuming it can do the same as 7-zip's Ultra 7z compression.
That sounds like a reasonable price to pay for SSL, IMHO. Nmap uses it for both version detection and NSE. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Jan 07)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Rob Nicholls (Jan 07)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Jan 07)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows DePriest, Jason R. (Feb 04)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Feb 05)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Fyodor (Feb 05)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows DePriest, Jason R. (Feb 05)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows DePriest, Jason R. (Feb 05)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Fyodor (Feb 05)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Feb 05)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Feb 05)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Feb 05)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Thomas Buchanan (Feb 06)
- Re: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows jah (Feb 07)
- RE: [RFC] OpenSSL and Windows Rob Nicholls (Jan 07)