Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99
From: "Jay Freeman \(saurik\)" <saurik () saurik com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:53:06 -0500
Gisle: Wouldn't the more correct approach be to create a better interface? One that returns a void * that must be returned when the mmap is to be destroyed? This entire issue is coming up because the Unix mmap() semantics are being required when they aren't sufficient for all platforms. Making it a stack still requires all memory mappings to be done in a nested fashion, which definitely isn't a requirement of any underlying API. Sincerely, Jay Freeman (saurik) saurik () saurik com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gisle Vanem" <giva () bgnett no> To: "Fyodor" <fyodor () insecure org> Cc: <nmap-dev () insecure org> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 6:54 PM Subject: Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99
"Fyodor" <fyodor () insecure org> said:Is there a good reason for not bailing if gmap is NULL? The point is to detect cases where the code munmap's a file that it hasn't even mmap'd (or if it munmaps a file twice). Other than these cases of API misuse, does the (gmap == 0) check cause any problems?You're correct. That patch isn't needed. But IMHO, we should try to make a stack of mapped files for Win32. --gv>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99, (continued)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Brett Hutley (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Brett Hutley (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Aug 31)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Fyodor (Sep 04)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Sep 04)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 04)
- Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99 Gisle Vanem (Aug 31)