Re: nmap 3.3+V-2.99

["Gisle Vanem" <giva () bgnett no>]

"Fyodor" <fyodor () insecure org> said:

> Is there a good reason for not bailing if gmap is NULL?  The point is
> to detect cases where the code munmap's a file that it hasn't even
> mmap'd (or if it munmaps a file twice).  Other than these cases of API
> misuse, does the (gmap == 0) check cause any problems?

You're correct. That patch isn't needed. But IMHO, we should try to 
make a stack of mapped files for Win32.

--gv


---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).