Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: C++ Development
From: Eric Anderson <eanderson () connectok com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:49:09 -0500
Why can't we label this another computer "holy war" and leave it to it's own devices? I personally would rather look at C code than C++ code. Although i would actually prerfer Perl to C, but that is another matter altogether. However, there is no absolute as far as C or C++ being the ultimate or best tool. Use C for optimized code, that runs fast... And use C++ if you are worried about "readable source code" (although from my personal experiences looking through inherited objects more than 2 - 3 levels deep is more obfuscated than helpful... but i digress). In short everyone has their own biases, and this arguement will end when every single *nix user on the planet agrees which distribution is best... SO... use whatever you prefer, and stop whining because someone didn't use your prefered language. -- Eric Anderson System Administrator ConnectOK.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Matthew Franz (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Fyodor (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Stou Sandalski (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Stou Sandalski (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Eric Anderson (Sep 13)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development H D Moore (Sep 12)