Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: C++ Development
From: Dragos Ruiu <dr () kyx net>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 19:45:58 -0700
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000, Jay Freeman (saurik) wrote:
Oh come on why are we even discussing this? Take nmap and move it to C++? Fyoder would be all over you in a minute.
There are lots of great reasons NOT to put any c++ in nmap: -Compiler availability -No matter how clever you make the compilers there is always some overhead... admittedly negligible but in my opinion the compiler world has been in intel Stasis for the last 10 years. Mebbe all whis vliw stuff will shake that. So unless they've changed the optimizers tremendously, since I looked there is still always a small hit at a minimum. -Heap overflows and other security sloppyness possible ...amongst others. So there might be others who are vocal about staying at the lower more predictable C level code for a network utility. :-) cheers, --dr -- dursec.com ltd. / kyx.net - we're from the future pgp fingerprint: 18C7 E37C 2F94 E251 F18E B7DC 2B71 A73E D2E8 A56D pgp key: http://www.dursec.com/drkey.asc --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- Re: C++ Development, (continued)
- Re: C++ Development Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Fyodor (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Stou Sandalski (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- RE: C++ Development Stou Sandalski (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Eric Anderson (Sep 13)
- RE: C++ Development Jay Freeman (saurik) (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development Etaoin Shrdlu (Sep 12)
- Re: C++ Development H D Moore (Sep 12)