Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block

["Brandon Butterworth" <brandon () bogons net>]

On 13/01/2024, 08:40:11, "Giorgio Bonfiglio via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
wrote:
> >  2) Assume that Google decided that they would no longer support IPv4 for any of their services at a specific date a 
> > couple of years in the future. […] I really expect something like this to be the next part of the end game for IPv4.
>
> It’s never gonna happen … why would Google, or any other internet property, launch something which artificially cuts 
> the potential revenue pool to IPv6-ready customers?

A step before that might not cost anything: add IPv6 search ranking 
boost
and see how fast the SEO hawkers push all content to v6, then it's just
down to those with cgnat realising they can save money by moving to IPv6 
too.

brandon