nanog mailing list archives
Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block
From: "Abraham Y. Chen" <aychen () avinta com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:36:27 -0500
Hi, Owen: 1) " ... IPv4 used to work before NAT made everything horrible. ":Utilizing 240/4, RAN is a flat space which should support this kind of rudimentary end-to-end connectivity within each RAN. (called L2 routing, correct?)
Regards, Abe (2024-01-20 10:35) On 2024-01-19 04:02, Owen DeLong wrote:
Any host connected to a reasonably well peered ISP (e.g. NOT Cogent) with IPv6 should be able to communicate with any other such host so long as the administrative policies on both sides permit it.I have no difficulty directly reaching a variety of IPv6 hosts from the /48 in my home.However, it’s not like dial-up modem operations in the PSTN in that IP is an inherently connectionless packet switched service while modems were an inherently circuit switched connection oriented service.However, it does work like IPv4 used to work before NAT made everything horrible.OwenOn Jan 15, 2024, at 12:20, Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com> wrote: Hi, Forrest: 1) I have a question:If I subscribe to IPv6, can I contact another similar subscriber to communicate (voice and data) directly between two homes in private like the dial-up modem operations in the PSTN? If so, is it available anywhere right now?Regards, Abe (2024-01-15 15:20)om <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient><x-msg://12/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Incentives, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Incentives Giorgio Bonfiglio via NANOG (Jan 13)
- Re: IPv6 Adoption Incentives Dave Taht (Jan 13)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brandon Butterworth (Jan 13)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brett O'Hara (Jan 13)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 13)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 18)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 19)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 20)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen via NANOG (Jan 24)
- RE: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jan 14)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brian Knight via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block sronan (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block sronan (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brandon Jackson (Jan 15)