nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 09:30:54 +0900
Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
It still looks like NAT to me.
Almost all the people, perhaps other than you, accept NAT as is to keep IPv4 Internet or as part of transition plan from IPv4 to IPv6.
NAT is a disgusting hack and destroys the universal peer to peer nature of the internet in favor of a consumer/provider model.
As I repeatedly pointed out, end to end NAT is clean preserving the universal peer to peer nature of the Internet. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ohta-e2e-nat-00 The basic idea is to let NAT boxes perform address translations only without adjusting check sums or translating ports and to let end systems perform reverse address translations, which restores correct check sums, and port number restrictions. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Matthew Petach (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 31)