Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC

[Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

> On Mar 30, 2022, at 17:00 , Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Tom Beecher wrote:
> >    If the IETF has really been unable to achieve consensus on properly
> >    supporting the currently still dominant internet protocol, that is
> >    seriously problematic and a huge process failure.
> >
> >
> > That is not an accurate statement.
> >
> > The IETF has achieved consensus on this topic. It's explained here by Brian Carpenter.
> >
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/qWaHXBKT8BOx208SbwWILDXyAUA/
>
> As I have explained with my newly introduced consensus standards, there is no such consensus.
>
> To reiterate my consensus standards, consensus is only to be considered as amongst stakeholders and IPv6 specific 
> related stakes are not relevant to IPv4. If you consider the reverse to be true as well, I think my version of 
> consensus would achieve a much wider and diverse consensus than the the stated IETF's consensus.
>
> Once a consensus has been proven invalid its beyond obnoxious to cling to it as though it maintains its own reality 
> field.

Yes, but you don’t have consensus for your new consensus standard, so…

Owen