nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 00:45:30 +0900
Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
IMHO: IETF is only partially guilty. Who was capable to predict in 1992-1994 that: - Wireless would become so popular (WiFi is from 1997)
IP mobility WG of IETF was formed in 1992.
- Hardware forwarding (PFE) would be invented (1997) that would have a big additional cost to implement Enhanced Headers
Optional IPv4 headers was considered harmful, IIRC before 1992, which has nothing to do with TCAM.
- Encryption would never have a small enough cost to make it mandatory
Cost of encryption is small enough. The problem is to securely share keys, for example, between a source and a router to let the router generate secure ICMP.
- Router would be available in every smallest thing that makes distributed address acquisition redundant (hi SLAAC)
Local router is always available for a network with two or more links, which was why SLAAC were a good idea.
We should be fair
You should. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Justin Streiner (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 31)
- RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Matthew Petach (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 26)