nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 14:29:34 -0700
it's easy to be critical of design decisions with 25y of hindsight
there was a good number of senior implementors and ops who screamed loudly at the time. to no avail. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 13)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Tony Wicks (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)