nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Eliot Lear <lear () ofcourseimright com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:37:47 +0200
8+8 came *MUCH* later than that, and really wasn't ready for prime time. The reason we know that is that work was the basis of LISP and ILNP. Yes, standing on the shoulders of giants. And there certainly were poor design decisions in IPv6, bundling IPsec being one. But the idea that operators were ignored? Feh.
On 14.09.21 14:10, Randy Bush wrote:
and 8+8, variable length, ... just didn't happen, eh? the nice thing about revisionist history is that anybody can play. randy
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 13)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Tony Wicks (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)