nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 16:59:30 -0700
I doubt many vendors were chomping at the bit to support CGNAT
definitely. they hate to sell big expensive boxes. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 13)
- RE: IPv6 woes - RFC Tony Wicks (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)