nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Edward McNair <emcnair () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:43:05 -0700
I cannot see how that would be any different from now things are now. My idea would be to expand the amount of categories that are available, instead of having one just one big bucket for everyone. Our mailing list is a clear indication that size does not fit all. Edward McNair Executive Director emcnair () nanog org | +1 866-902-1336 ext. 102 | www.nanog.org NANOG | 305 E. Eisenhower Pkwy, Suite 100 | Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:38 PM, heasley <heas () shrubbery net> wrote: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:26:59PM -0700, Edward McNair:We currently have a beta instance of Discourse running: https://www.discourse.org/features <https://www.discourse.org/features> It gives us the same functionality as Mailman, with a more flexible, modern interface, and many new features. We will keep the community posted as we explore its functionality.a big problem with forum <-> email gateways (or forums in general) is that those using the forum are even less likely to a) filter themselves (ie: decide that their "input" is useless and not reply) and b) figure out the difference between reply and reply-all and choose wisely.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens, (continued)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Ethan O'Toole (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Christopher Conforti (Mar 23)
- Re: OT: Re: Facebook and other walled gardens Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Bryan Fields (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Popovitch via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 23)